The Great Emu War: When Birds Defeated the Army!
In November 1932, the nation of Australia did something no country had done before or since: it deployed its military against birds. Not enemy aircraft. Not hostile drones. Emus. Large, flightless, surprisingly fast birds indigenous to the Australian continent that had the audacity to wander into wheat fields in the Campion district of Western Australia and eat the crops. The Australian government, under the direction of Minister of Defence Sir George Pearce, sent soldiers of the Royal Australian Artillery, armed with Lewis machine guns capable of firing 500 to 600 rounds per minute, to deal with an estimated 20,000 emus that had migrated into the farming district and were devastating the wheat crops of struggling ex-soldier settlers. What followed was one of the most absurd military campaigns in human history — a month-long operation in which highly trained soldiers with automatic weapons proved spectacularly ineffective against large, fast-moving birds with a remarkable talent for evasion. By the time the military withdrew on December 10, 1932, the official tally was 986 emus killed out of an estimated population of 20,000, at a cost of approximately 10,000 rounds of ammunition. The operation was widely mocked in the press, debated in Parliament, and ultimately abandoned in favor of a simple bounty system that proved far more effective. The Great Emu War has since become one of Australia's most beloved historical anecdotes — a story so absurd that it sounds like a Monty Python sketch, except that every word of it is true. It stands alongside the bizarre Boston Molasses Flood, the strange coincidence of Wilmer McLean's Civil War home, and the unsolved mystery of the Roman Dodecahedra as one of history's most delightfully improbable events.
The roots of the Great Emu War lie in the aftermath of World War I. After the war ended in 1918, the Australian government faced the challenge of reintegrating thousands of discharged veterans into civilian life. The solution was the Soldier Settlement Scheme, a program that granted returned soldiers parcels of land in agricultural areas — often in marginal farming country that experienced farmers would have avoided. In Western Australia, large areas of the Wheatbelt region, including the Campion district near the town of Walgoolan, were allocated to veteran farmers who were instructed to grow wheat. The government promised subsidies, agricultural support, and — critically — fences to protect the crops. The subsidies were slow to arrive. The agricultural support was minimal. The fences were never built. The veterans, many of whom had no farming experience, found themselves struggling to coax wheat from dry, marginal soil in the midst of the Great Depression, which had begun in 1929 and had driven wheat prices to historic lows. They were barely scraping by when the emus arrived — and the emus changed everything.
The Enemy: 20,000 Birds on the March
The emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) is the second-largest living bird by height, after the ostrich, and is endemic to Australia. Adult emus can reach heights of up to 6.2 feet (1.9 meters) and weigh up to 130 pounds (59 kilograms). They are flightless, but they are far from helpless: emus can run at sustained speeds of up to 30 miles per hour (50 km/h), can sprint even faster in short bursts, and are remarkably agile for their size. They are also extraordinarily hardy, capable of surviving in the harsh Australian outback by going weeks without food or water, and they have a temperament that can charitably be described as "unbothered." When confronted with danger, emus do not typically stand and fight — they scatter, running in multiple directions at high speed, making them extremely difficult targets for hunters or, as the Australian Army would discover, machine-gun crews.
In late 1932, a migration of approximately 20,000 emus moved inland from the coastal regions of Western Australia, following their traditional seasonal patterns in search of food and water. The long, dry summer had reduced their usual food sources, and the emus discovered something far better: the wheat fields of the Campion district, filled with ripe, nutritious grain and plenty of water from the farmers' irrigation systems. The birds descended on the crops in enormous flocks, eating the wheat, trampling the young plants, and — perhaps most damaging of all — destroying the rabbit-proof fences that farmers had painstakingly erected to protect their fields. The damaged fences allowed rabbits to pour into the farmland, compounding the destruction. The emus were not malicious; they were simply doing what emus do — eating, walking, and ignoring the increasingly desperate entreaties of the human beings whose livelihoods they were destroying. But for the veteran farmers, many of whom had survived the horrors of the Western Front only to face financial ruin at the hands (wings?) of giant birds, the emu invasion was the last straw.
🦓 The Emu on the Coat of Arms
The irony of the Great Emu War is deepened by the fact that the emu appears on the Australian coat of arms, alongside the kangaroo. Both animals were chosen because they are native to Australia and because, according to popular belief, neither can walk backward — symbolizing a nation that only moves forward. The coat of arms was granted by King George V in 1912, twenty years before the government sent soldiers to shoot the bird that represents the nation. Emus are now protected under Australian law, though they are not considered endangered. The current emu population in Australia is estimated at between 630,000 and 725,000 birds, and they remain a common sight in rural and semi-rural areas across the continent. The kangaroo, incidentally, was never subjected to a military campaign — though it has caused its share of automotive incidents.
The First Battle: Machine Guns vs. Birds
The farmers' complaints reached Sir George Pearce, the Australian Minister of Defence, who approved a military operation to deal with the emu problem. The decision was influenced by the political reality that the veteran farmers were a sympathetic constituency — men who had served their country in war and were now being driven to ruin by birds — and by the agricultural lobby's pressure for government action. Pearce authorized the deployment of soldiers from the Royal Australian Artillery, under the command of Major G.P.W. Meredith. The soldiers were armed with Lewis Guns, light machine guns that had been used extensively in World War I. The Lewis Gun had a rate of fire of 500 to 600 rounds per minute and was typically fed from a 47-round drum magazine. It was an effective weapon against infantry. Against emus, it proved far less successful than anticipated.
The first engagement took place on November 2, 1932, in the Campion district. Meredith and his men positioned themselves near a group of emus and opened fire. The results were underwhelming. The emus, startled by the noise, scattered almost immediately, breaking into small groups and running at high speed across the open terrain. The soldiers, accustomed to fighting human enemies who tended to take cover rather than sprint away at 30 miles per hour, struggled to track and hit the fast-moving birds. Many rounds were fired; few emus were killed. The Lewis Guns jammed frequently in the dusty conditions, and during each jam, the surviving emus simply ran out of range. The initial engagement was widely regarded as a failure. Major Meredith, who appears to have been a professional soldier with a wry sense of humor, later delivered one of the most memorable assessments in Australian military history. Observing the emus' remarkable ability to absorb bullets and keep running, he reportedly said: "If we had a military division with the bullet-carrying capacity of these birds it would face any army in the world... They can face machine guns with the invulnerability of tanks."
The Truck Ambush: A New Strategy Fails
After the initial failures, Major Meredith adapted his tactics. On November 4, 1932, he attempted a mass engagement near a local dam where an estimated 1,000 emus had gathered. The plan was to ambush the birds at close range and use the concentrated firepower of the Lewis Guns to bring down large numbers. But the emus once again confounded the soldiers. As soon as firing began, the birds scattered in every direction, and the Lewis Guns jammed repeatedly. During one particularly frustrating episode, a gun was mounted on a truck in an attempt to pursue the fleeing emus — but the truck could not keep up with the birds over the rough, uneven terrain, and the vibration of the vehicle made accurate aiming impossible. The idea of a motorized emu hunt was quickly abandoned. By the end of the November 4 engagement, approximately 2,500 rounds of ammunition had been expended for relatively few confirmed kills. The operation was suspended on November 8 while Meredith reported back to his superiors.
💥 By the Numbers: The Emu War Tally
The final statistics of the Great Emu War tell the story of military futility in miniature. Over the course of the operation (November 2 to December 10, 1932), the Australian Army expended approximately 10,000 rounds of ammunition. The official count of emus killed was 986 birds — a ratio of roughly 10 bullets per emu. Farmers and local witnesses estimated the actual death toll may have been higher, possibly up to 2,500 emus, but even the higher estimate represents only about 12.5 percent of the estimated 20,000-bird population. By contrast, the bounty system that replaced the military operation was far more efficient: between 1945 and 1960, claimants collected bounties on 284,794 emus in Western Australia alone. The military operation was briefly resumed on November 12-13 after pressure from local politicians, with similar results. Major Meredith also led a second, slightly more successful operation in 1934, but by that point the government had largely accepted that machine guns were not the right tool for emu management.
The Aftermath: Parliament, the Press, and the Bounty System
The Great Emu War was a public relations disaster for the Australian government. The media had a field day with the story, dubbing it "The Great Emu War" and running headlines that mocked the military's inability to defeat a flock of birds. Australian newspapers published cartoons of emus dodging machine-gun fire and soldiers fleeing from enormous birds. The story was picked up by international media and became a source of amusement and bemusement around the world. In Parliament, the operation was debated with a mixture of outrage and hilarity. Sir George Pearce, who had approved the deployment, was subjected to pointed questioning about the wisdom of sending the army to fight birds. One parliamentarian reportedly asked whether a "war medal" would be issued for the campaign. Another suggested that the soldiers should be sent back with "greater firepower" — presumably a joke, though the line between joke and policy in the Emu War was always thin. Pearce bore the brunt of the criticism and was widely mocked for his role in what became known as one of the most embarrassing government operations in Australian history.
The government's response to the failure was to try a different approach entirely. After the military withdrawal on December 10, 1932, the government provided farmers with ammunition — reportedly 500,000 rounds — and encouraged them to shoot the emus themselves. More importantly, the government strengthened the existing bounty system, which had been established in 1923 and paid farmers a fixed amount per emu scalp. The bounty system proved dramatically more effective than the military operation, for a simple reason: individual farmers, hunting alone or in small groups on foot or horseback, could approach emus quietly and shoot them at close range with rifles — a method far better suited to the terrain and the behavior of the birds than noisy, conspicuous machine-gun ambushes. Between 1945 and 1960, the bounty system resulted in the collection of 284,794 emu scalps in Western Australia, a figure that dwarfs the military's tally of 986 birds. The lesson was clear: when it comes to managing wildlife, patient hunters with rifles are more effective than soldiers with machine guns — a principle that has been confirmed by human-wildlife conflict management programs around the world, from elephant crop-raiding in Africa to wild boar management in the American Southwest.
The Legacy: From Military Fiasco to Internet Legend
The Great Emu War faded into relative obscurity for several decades after 1932, remembered primarily as a quirky anecdote in Australian history. In the 2010s, however, the story experienced a remarkable resurgence as an internet meme. The image of soldiers with machine guns fighting — and losing to — giant flightless birds proved irresistible to online communities, and the Emu War became a staple of history memes, Reddit threads, YouTube videos, and social media posts. The story's appeal is easy to understand: it combines military absurdity, animal cunning, bureaucratic incompetence, and a deeply Australian sense of the ridiculous. Ornithologist Dominic Serventy, one of Australia's leading bird scientists, helped explain the emus' remarkable evasion tactics, noting that the birds' natural response to threats — scattering at high speed in multiple directions — made them nearly impossible targets for a coordinated military engagement. The Emu War has since been referenced in video games, television shows, and comedy routines, and is regularly cited as one of the most entertaining examples of human-wildlife conflict in history. It serves as a reminder that nature does not always cooperate with military planning — and that sometimes, the most effective solution to a problem is the simplest one.
👑 Other Famous Human-Wildlife Conflicts
The Great Emu War is not the only time humans have engaged in organized conflict with animals. In the British colonial occupation of India, authorities declared war on rabid dogs in several cities, with mixed results. In modern Africa, elephants regularly raid crops in villages near national parks, leading to sometimes violent confrontations between farmers and conservationists. In the American state of Texas, wild boars (feral hogs) cause an estimated $400 million in agricultural damage annually, and despite organized hunting campaigns, helicopter shooting operations, and legislative efforts, the wild boar population continues to grow, now estimated at over 3 million animals. And in World War I, the British Army famously employed 500,000 cats to control the rat population in the trenches — a campaign that, unlike the Emu War, was considered a success. The common thread in all of these conflicts is that wildlife management is a complex ecological challenge that rarely responds well to brute force or military-style solutions — a lesson that the Australian government learned the hard way in 1932.
🦓 The Birds Won
The Great Emu War of 1932 is, at its core, a story about the limits of human power. The Australian government sent trained soldiers with automatic weapons to fight a flock of flightless birds, and the birds won. Not through courage or strategy or intelligence — the emus simply did what emus do. They ran. They scattered. They absorbed bullets and kept going. They proved that a determined animal with strong legs and no concept of military hierarchy is remarkably difficult to exterminate with a machine gun. The Emu War is funny — it is impossible not to laugh at the image of soldiers crouching behind Lewis Guns, waiting in ambush for a flock of giant birds, only to watch the birds sprint away at 30 miles per hour while the guns jam. But it is also a reminder that human beings are not always the masters of the natural world that we imagine ourselves to be. We can split the atom and walk on the moon, but we cannot defeat 20,000 emus with machine guns. The farmers of the Campion district eventually found a solution — the bounty system worked where the military did not — and the emu population was gradually brought under control through patient, sustained effort rather than dramatic military operations. The Emu War teaches us that nature is not an enemy to be defeated but a force to be managed with respect, patience, and a healthy dose of humility. And perhaps a sense of humor.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the Great Emu War?
The Great Emu War was a military operation conducted by the Australian Army in November-December 1932 in the Campion district of Western Australia. Approximately 20,000 emus had migrated into the wheat-growing region and were destroying crops. At the request of struggling farmers — many of them World War I veterans — the government deployed soldiers armed with Lewis machine guns under the command of Major G.P.W. Meredith of the Royal Australian Artillery. The operation lasted approximately five weeks and resulted in the confirmed deaths of 986 emus at a cost of roughly 10,000 rounds of ammunition. The operation was widely considered a failure and was mocked in the press and in Parliament.
Why did the Australian Army fight emus?
After World War I, the Australian government settled discharged veterans on farming land in the Wheatbelt of Western Australia through the Soldier Settlement Scheme. The land was agriculturally marginal, and the farmers — who had been promised government subsidies and fencing that never materialized — were already struggling when the Great Depression hit in 1929. In 1932, a migration of approximately 20,000 emus moved into the district, eating and trampling the wheat crops and destroying fences that allowed rabbits to invade. The desperate farmers appealed to the government for help, and Minister of Defence Sir George Pearce approved the deployment of the military to cull the emu population.
How many emus were killed in the Emu War?
The official count of emus killed during the Great Emu War was 986 birds, though some estimates range as high as 2,500. The operation expended approximately 10,000 rounds of ammunition, meaning roughly 10 bullets were fired for every confirmed emu kill. By comparison, the bounty system that replaced the military operation resulted in the collection of 284,794 emu scalps in Western Australia between 1945 and 1960 — demonstrating that patient hunting by individual farmers was far more effective than military-style operations.
Are emus still protected in Australia?
Yes. Emus are now protected under Australian law and appear on the Australian coat of arms alongside the kangaroo. They cannot be killed without a permit, though permits are issued in cases where emus cause significant agricultural damage. The emu population in Australia is currently estimated at between 630,000 and 725,000 birds, and the species is not considered threatened or endangered. The bounty system was phased out as emu populations stabilized and conservation laws were strengthened in the latter half of the twentieth century.
📖 Recommended Reading
Want to explore more about unexplained events and strange phenomena that have shaped our world? Check out The Great Emu War on Amazon for a fascinating investigation into unexplained aerial phenomena by a respected investigative journalist — a reminder that truth is often stranger than fiction. (As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.)
References & Further Reading
- Wikipedia: Emu War — Comprehensive article covering the background, military operations, aftermath, and legacy of the Great Emu War
- Britannica: Emu War — Encyclopaedia Britannica overview of the conflict, combatants, casualties, and outcome
- Wikipedia: Emu — Biology, behavior, and conservation status of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae)
- Wikipedia: Soldier Settlement (Australia) — The post-WWI program that placed veterans on farming land in Western Australia
- Wikipedia: Lewis Gun — The light machine gun used by Australian soldiers during the Emu War
- Wikipedia: Coat of Arms of Australia — The national emblem featuring the emu and kangaroo
Editorial note: the Great Emu War is one of the best-documented human-wildlife conflicts in Australian history, with extensive records in the Australian National Archives and contemporary newspaper accounts. See our Editorial Policy.